The ‘Pink Agenda’: Questioning and Challenging European Homonationalist Sexual Citizenship
The ‘Pink Agenda’: Questioning and Challenging European Homonationalist Sexual Citizenship
复制标题
“粉红议程”：质疑和挑战欧洲同性恋性公民权
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Francesca Romana Ammaturo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Francesca Romana Ammaturo
本文介绍了“粉红议程”作为民族国家和国际人权机构（如欧洲理事会）为实现某些社会政治目标而采用的一套司法、社会和政治工具：一方面，在欧洲以外积极促进特定的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者身份;另一方面，在欧洲边界内形成了容忍国家和不容忍国家之间的二分法。“粉红议程”的成功颁布是通过建立和加强欧洲性公民的概念来实现的，这种概念具有强烈的同性恋民族主义性质。通过对欧洲人权法院判例的分析，文章强调了性公民的人类民族主义范式被应用于加强宽容和不宽容的成员国之间的鸿沟，并建议存在一个同性恋友好的“西方”和同性恋和变性非西方国家之间的差异。
This article introduces the ‘Pink Agenda’ as a set of judicial, social and political instruments employed by both nation-states and international human rights institutions, such as the Council of Europe, to achieve some socio-political goals: on the one hand, the proactive promotion of specific lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender identities beyond Europe; on the other, the creation of a dichotomy between tolerant and intolerant countries within the borders of Europe. The successful enactment of the ‘Pink Agenda’ is achieved by building and reinforcing a concept of European Sexual Citizenship that is strongly homonationalist in nature. Through an analysis of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the article emphasises the way in which the homonationalist paradigm of sexual citizenship is applied to strengthen the divide between tolerant and intolerant member states and to suggest the existence of a difference between a queer-friendly ‘West’ and homophobic and transphobic non-western countries.