Comparison of Accuracy Among Prognostic Scores for Predicting Life Expectancy in Korean Patients With Cancer With Weeks of Survival

Comparison of Accuracy Among Prognostic Scores for Predicting Life Expectancy in Korean Patients With Cancer With Weeks of Survival
复制标题

韩国癌症患者存活数周的预期寿命预测评分的准确性比较

DOI:
10.1177/1049909113503486
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Samyong Kim
Samyong Kim
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Seok;J. Jung;Jong;Sung;Samyong Kim

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

比较4种预后评分的准确性(姑息预后评分(PaP)、谵妄-PaP(D-PaP)、姑息预后指数(PPI)、客观预后评分(OPS)),用于预测存活数周的韩国癌症患者的预期寿命,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,回顾了94例患者的病历,比较了3周和30周的准确性,4个预后评分中的生存天数。PaP的3周生存率估计值最高,4种预后评分的30天估计值相似。PaP的受试者工作特征曲线下面积最高,PPI最低,但无显著差异。两组的运动学评分没有显著差异。
To compare the accuracy among 4 prognostic scores (Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP), Delirium-PaP (D-PaP), Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Objective Prognostic Score (OPS)) for predicting life expectancy in Korean cancer patients with weeks of survival, we conducted a retrospective study by reviewing medical records of 94 patients and compared the accuracy of 3-week and 30-day survival among the 4 prognostic scores. Three-week survival estimates were highest for the PaP and 30-day estimates were similar for the 4 prognostic scores. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for the PaP and lowest for the PPI, but there were no significant differences. The prognostics scores did not differ from each other in a significant manner.