From Governance to Governance Failure and from Multi-level Governance to Multi-scalar Meta-governance
From Governance to Governance Failure and from Multi-level Governance to Multi-scalar Meta-governance
复制标题
从治理到治理失败，从多层次治理到多尺度元治理
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Jessop
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Jessop
本章反思了当前后民族国家时代治理实践的时空复杂性。两个截然不同的例子说明了这一点：第一个是日益强调“社会工作的地域化”，其中越来越强调扎根(但产生了“领土陷阱”)；第二个是日益强调“就业政策的欧洲化”，开放协调方法的作用被声称是对国家政策和整个欧洲视角之间明显紧张关系的有效回应(但仍存在“治理差距”)。这些案例表明，当前治理做法的高度复杂性和治理失败的可能性很高。这使得作者提倡“多标量元治理”的观点，在这种视角下，“治理的治理”以及“治理的多层面空间性”受到威胁。然而，这不应被误解为在更高层面上要求“理性管理”的又一次恳求。相反，作者提出了反身性、灵活性和反讽原则作为这一方法的基本前提。
This chapter reflects on the time-space complexity of governance practices in the current era of post-national statehood. This is illustrated through two contrasting examples: the first is the growing emphasis on the “territorialization of social work”, where rootedness in place is increasingly emphasized (but generates a “territorial trap”); the second is the growing emphasis on the “Europeanization of employment policy”, where the role of the open method of coordination (OMC) is claimed to be an effective response to the clear tensions between national policies and the European-wide perspective (but maintains a “governance gap”). These cases show the high complexity of current governance practices and the high likelihood of governance failure. This brings the author to advocate the “multi-scalar meta-governance” perspective, in which the “governance of governance” as well as the “multi-faceted spatiality of governance” are at stake. However, this should not be misunderstood as another plea for “rational management” at a higher level. Instead, the author poses the principles of reflexivity, flexibility and irony as the basic premises of such an approach.