Understanding the Background Conditions of Skilled Movement in Sport: A Study of Searle's ‘Background Capacities’
Understanding the Background Conditions of Skilled Movement in Sport: A Study of Searle's ‘Background Capacities’
复制标题
了解体育运动中技巧动作的背景条件：塞尔“背景能力”的研究
DOI：
10.1080/17511320701711432
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. F. Moe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. F. Moe
在本文中，我采取了约翰塞尔的帐户的“背景能力”，使可理解的前提和隐藏方面的背景条件，使性能的熟练运动。本文首先回顾了塞尔的初始帐户的背景能力，以及如何将这张照片可以应用到占熟练的运动在体育运动。然后反对这张照片是解决，声称塞尔的初始图片可能'overrepresentationalise'的背景条件。此外，这一反对意见提示塞尔如何修改他的初始图片的背景条件，根据他最近的“联系原则”。塞尔最近的帐户的背景条件，然后阐述和讨论的下半年的文件。讨论强调三个不同层次的分析塞尔的框架需要充分了解他的背景条件：（一）神经生理水平;（二）描述性的高阶实践技能水平;（三）逻辑水平的整合。有人认为，塞尔的逻辑框架是合理的，但需要更多的工作，以更好地了解背景条件的熟练运动的神经生理能力和实用技能，从科学和哲学的角度。
In this paper I take up John Searle's account of ‘Background capacities’ to render intelligible the presupposed and hidden aspects of the background conditions that enable the performance of skilled movement. The paper begins with a review of Searle's initial account of Background capacities and how this picture can be applied to account for skilled movement in sport. Then an objection to this picture is addressed, claiming that Searle's initial picture might ‘overrepresentationalise’ background conditions. Moreover, this objection prompts how Searle has modified his initial picture of background conditions in accordance with his more recent ‘connection principle’. Searle's recent account of background conditions is then elaborated and discussed in the second half of the paper. The discussion emphasises three distinct levels of analysis in Searle's framework necessary to a full understanding of his background conditions: (i) the neurophysiological level; (ii) the descriptive higher-order practical skill level; and (iii) the logical level of integration. It is argued that Searle's logical framework is found plausible, but that more work is needed to better understand the background conditions of skilled movement in terms of neurophysiological capacities and practical skills from both scientific and philosophical perspectives.