Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists
Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03195802
复制
发表时间：
2003-12-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Kuhbandner, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bäuml, KH;Kuhbandner, C
DRM列表（Roediger & McDermott，1995）中，我们在两个实验中比较了提取练习对一个项目子集的影响以及这些项目作为提取线索的呈现对列表关键项目回忆的影响。在实验1中，关键项目是研究列表的一部分，因此解决了这些项目的真实回忆;在实验2中，他们没有被研究，因此解决了这些项目的错误回忆。出现了三大成果。首先，提取实践和部分列表提示减少了真实和错误的回忆。第二，这两种操作在真实回忆中产生了整合效应，在低错误回忆水平的列表中有大量的遗忘，而在高错误回忆水平的列表中没有遗忘。第三，提取练习和部分线索提示对回忆的影响在质和量上是一致的。这些结果表明，检索实践和部分列表线索的不利影响是由类似的机制介导的。这与不仅提取性遗忘，而且部分线索提示也是由抑制过程引起的观点是一致的。
DRM lists (Roediger & McDermott, 1995) in two experiments, we compared the effects of retrieval practice on a subset of the items and of the presentation of those items as retrieval cues at test on recall of the lists' critical items. In Experiment 1, the critical items were part of the studied lists, thus addressing these items' veridical recall; in Experiment 2, they were not studied, thus addressing these items' false recall. Three major results emerged. First, retrieval practice and part-list cuing reduced both veridical and false recall. Second, the two manipulations induced an integration effect in veridical recall, with substantial forgetting in lists with low false recall levels and no forgetting in lists with high false recall levels. Third, retrieval practice and part-list cuing created the same effects on recall, qualitatively and quantitatively. These results suggest that the detrimental effects of retrieval practice and part-list cuing were mediated by similar mechanisms. They are consistent with the view that not only retrieval-induced forgetting, but also part-list cuing is caused by inhibitory processes.