Forgetting cues are ineffective in promoting forgetting in the item-method directed forgetting paradigm
Forgetting cues are ineffective in promoting forgetting in the item-method directed forgetting paradigm
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.07.004
复制
发表时间：
2019-10-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Zhang, Qi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gao, Heming;Qi, Mingming;Zhang, Qi
本研究旨在考察遗忘线索在项目方法指导的遗忘范式中的有效性。在项目-方法DF范式中增加了一个修正的无线索(NC)条件，即参与者不能采用有意遗忘策略。比较正常记忆状态和被遗忘状态下的记忆保持情况。结果表明，被试的再认反应时，被试对被试的再认反应时(RTS)对于被试来说，被试对被试来说可能比被记忆的NC(NC-R)词短，而被遗忘的被试比被遗忘的NC(NC-R)词的被试的再认反应时长，这说明被试可能比NC(NC)词更熟悉。事件相关电位结果显示，与NC-R词相比，TBF-R词的LPC活性和额叶新旧效应均增强。这些结果可能表明，与NC词相比，被试对任务型词汇的熟悉程度更高。本研究进一步支持了项目-方法DF范式中遗忘线索实际上并不能促进遗忘的观点。
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of forgetting cues in an item-method directed forgetting (DF) paradigm. A modified no-cue (NC) condition, in which participants could not adopt intentional forgetting strategy, was added to an item-method DF paradigm. Memory retention was compared between NC condition and to-be-forgotten (TBF) condition. The results revealed that the recognition reaction times (RTs) were shorter for the remembered TBF (TBF-R) words than for the remembered NC (NC-R) words, and were longer for the forgotten TBF words relative to the forgotten NC words, indicating that participants might be more familiar with the TBF words than the NC words. Event-related potential results showed that both LPC activity and frontal old/new effect were enhanced for TBF-R words relative to the NC-R words. These results might indicate that participants were more familiar with TBF words than NC words. This study further supports the view that forgetting cues may not in fact promote forgetting in the item-method DF paradigm.