AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VIDEOCONFERENCING WITHIN A SCHOOL-BASED BEHAVIORAL CONSULTATION FRAMEWORK

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCEPTABILITY OF VIDEOCONFERENCING WITHIN A SCHOOL-BASED BEHAVIORAL CONSULTATION FRAMEWORK
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/pits.21900
复制
发表时间:
2016-03-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Gresham, Frank M.
Gresham, Frank M.
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fischer, Aaron J.;Dart, Evan H.;Gresham, Frank M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

与任课教师进行校本行为咨询是学校心理学家向学生提供干预服务的主要方式之一。本研究的目的是评估视频会议(VC)作为一种替代媒介的协商沟通与教师的可接受性。具体而言,问题识别访谈(PIIs)进行了60名教师模拟一个典型的咨询互动。每位教师完成了两个PIIs与研究顾问,一个在传统的面对面(FtF)的格式和一个在视频会议(VC)的格式教师完成了两个简短的事前事后措施,快速形式的技术可接受性模型(FF-TAM)和距离沟通舒适度量表(DCCS),以评估VC的可接受性。采用多元回归分析评价了VC可接受性的人口统计学调节因素。结果表明,尽管教师在参加VC采访之前将VC评为可接受的沟通媒介,但在参加研究后,教师的可接受性评级上升至高度可接受。最后,没有变量被确定为显着调节教师的VC和他们的人口统计变量的可接受性评级之间的关系。对实践和未来研究的影响进行了讨论。
School-based behavioral consultation with classroom teachers is one of the primary ways school psychologists deliver intervention services to students. The present study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of videoconferencing (VC) with teachers as an alternative medium of consultative communication. Specifically, problem identification interviews (PIIs) were conducted with 60 classroom teachers to simulate a typical consultation interaction. Each teacher completed two PIIs with the researcher consultants, one in a traditional face-to-face (FtF) format and one in a videoconference (VC) format Teachers completed two brief pre-post measures, the Fast Form of the Technology Acceptability Model (FF-TAM) and the Distance Communication Comfort Scale (DCCS) to evaluate the acceptability of VC. Demographic moderators of the acceptability of VC were evaluated using a multiple regression analysis. The results suggest that although teachers rated VC as an acceptable communication medium prior to participating in the VC interview, teacher acceptability ratings increased to highly acceptable after participating in the study. Finally, no variables were identified that significantly moderated the relationship between teachers' acceptability rating of VC and their demographic variables. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.