HYPNOSIS TO MANAGE DISTRESS RELATED TO MEDICAL PROCEDURES: A META-ANALYSIS.
HYPNOSIS TO MANAGE DISTRESS RELATED TO MEDICAL PROCEDURES: A META-ANALYSIS.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ch.364
复制
发表时间：
2008-08-21
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Montgomery, Guy H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schnur, Julie B;Kafer, Ilana;Marcus, Carolyn;Montgomery, Guy H
这项荟萃分析评估了催眠在减少与医疗程序相关的情绪困扰方面的作用。从PsycINFO和PubMed成立到2008年2月进行了检索。催眠干预的随机对照试验，在临床医疗程序的背景下，与痛苦的结果，被纳入荟萃分析（26 61篇论文最初审查）。关于样本量、研究方法、参与者年龄和结局的信息由2位作者使用标准化表格独立提取。分歧以协商一致方式解决。26项试验的效果基于2342名参与者。结果表明，总体大效应量（ES）为0.88（95% CI = 0.57-1.19），有利于催眠。根据年龄（儿童比成人受益更大）和催眠方法，效果大小差异显着（p < 0.01），但根据所使用的控制条件（标准护理与注意力控制）没有差异。
This meta-analysis evaluates the effect of hypnosis in reducing emotional distress associated with medical procedures. PsycINFO and PubMed were searched from their inception through February 2008. Randomized controlled trials of hypnosis interventions, administered in the context of clinical medical procedures, with a distress outcome, were included in the meta-analysis (26 of 61 papers initially reviewed). Information on sample size, study methodology, participant age and outcomes were abstracted independently by 2 authors using a standardized form. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Effects from the 26 trials were based on 2342 participants. Results indicated an overall large effect size (ES) of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.57–1.19) in favour of hypnosis. Effect sizes differed significantly (p < 0.01) according to age (children benefitted to a greater extent than adults) and method of hypnosis delivery, but did not differ based on the control condition used (standard care vs. attention control).