Constellation analysis as a means of interdisciplinary innovation research: theory formation from the bottom up
Constellation analysis as a means of interdisciplinary innovation research: theory formation from the bottom up
复制标题
星座分析作为跨学科创新研究的手段：自下而上的理论形成
DOI：
10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.258-278
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Schön
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Ohlhorst;S. Schön
»Konstellationsanalysis als Werkzeug der interdisziplinären Innovationsforschung – Theoriebildung mit Bottom-up-Ansatz«。星座分析是创新研究的一种方法论，旨在理解高度复杂的发明和传播过程。它是作为技术、可持续性和创新的跨学科研究工具而开发的。它的工具集有助于使用不同的方法从不同的角度访问科学对象。该方法论的特点特别在于两个因素：异质影响因素及其在创新过程中的有效性原则上被认为是等效的，彼此相关地存在，从而组合在一起形成星座。此外，该方法促进了自下而上的方法，类似于扎根理论方法。根据这一原则，星座是根据其奇异单位及其相互关系来描述的。因此，该方法适用于创新过程的具体过程。它能够通过比较不同的创新传记来寻找新模式，并允许将战略方法进行实验作为一种特殊的验证形式。
»Konstellationsanalyse als Werkzeug der interdisziplinären Innovationsforschung – Theoriebildung mit Bottom-up-Ansatz«. Constellation Analysis is a methodological approach of innovation research that aims at understanding highly complex processes of invention and diffusion. It was developed as a tool for interand transdisciplinary research on technology, sustainability and innovation. Its set of tools facilitates access to a scientific object from different perspectives, using different approaches. The methodology is characterized in particular by two factors: Heterogeneous factors of influence and their effectiveness in innovation processes are principally considered equivalent, existing in relation to one another and thus fitting together into constellations. Furthermore, the methodology facilitates a bottom-up approach, similar to the Grounded Theory Approach. According to this principle, constellations are described based on their singular units and their relationships to each other. The methodology is thus appropriate to the individual course of innovation processes. It enables the search for new patterns through the comparison of different innovation biographies and allows experimentation with strategic approaches as a special form of validation.
跨学科研究合作的障碍：科学范式和制度实践
DOI：
10.1068/a4175
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
Economy and Space
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lowe P
通讯作者：
Lowe P