The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic

The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic
复制标题

小蓝皮书:思考和谈论民主的基本指南

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Wehling
E. Wehling
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Lakoff;E. Wehling

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

前言:无意识的真实的理性所使用的逻辑与政治学、经济学、法律和公共政策等学科所教授的逻辑大不相同。民主党人经常在这些领域接受培训,但他们通常没有被教授过真实的思维机制,即表征认知框架和概念隐喻等现象的神经过程。特别是在政治上,保守派和进步派之间的差异很大,他们的价值观和理性模式不同。他们一直被教导,并且仍然相信,人们在任何时候都有意识地意识到他们在想什么,并且词语直接根据世界来定义。他们通常认为,每个人的推理方式都是一样的,如果他们只是告诉人们事实,大多数人都会得出正确的结论。但由于这在科学上是错误的,它一直没有发生。
Preface: Real reason, the unconscious kind, uses a logic very different from that typically taught in departments of political science, economics, law, and public policy Democrats, frequently trained in those fields, have not commonly been taught the mechanisms of real thought—the neural processes that characterize phenomena such as cognitive frames and conceptual metaphors. Especially in politics, these can vary considerably between conservatives and progressives, who differ in their values and their mode of reason. They have been taught, and still believe, that people are at all times consciously aware of what they think and that words are defined directly in terms of the world. They commonly believe that everyone reasons the same way and that if they just tell people the facts, most people will reason to the right conclusion. But since this is scientifically false, it keeps not happening.