The development of a test of motor creativity.

The development of a test of motor creativity.
复制标题

开发运动创造力测试。

DOI:
10.1080/10671188.1968.10616608
复制
发表时间:
1968
期刊:
Research quarterly
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Waneen Wyrick
Waneen Wyrick
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Waneen Wyrick

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 针对四种激励器分别设计了四个测试项目:橡皮球、平行线、红环和低平衡木。这些激励因素旨在作为测试的刺激物,能够区分个体在解决运动性质的问题任务中产生运动反应的数量和独特性的能力。其中八个测试项目在一天进行,其余八个在第二天进行。项目的等效形式可靠性范围为 0.59 至 0.92。第一天的内部系数可靠性为 0.87,第二天的内部系数可靠性为 0.92;然而,由于诸如受试者内部方差等因素,仅对第一天的数据进行多元回归分析以确定最终的测试组。研究了评分方法,例如对回答数量进行求和(流畅性)、计算出现频率(原创性)以及将流畅性和原创性得分相结合。分析中出现了三种测试形式,每种形式都测量运动创造力的不同方面。 ...
Abstract Four test items were devised for each of four motivators: rubber balls, parallel-lines, a red hoop, and a low balance beam. These motivators were designed to serve as stimuli for tests capable of differentiating individual ability to produce both number and uniqueness of motor responses in problem solving tasks of a motor nature. Eight of the test items were administered one day and the remaining eight the following day. Equivalent form reliabilities for items ranged from .59 to .92. Internal coefficient reliabilities were .87 for day I and .92 for day II; however, because of factors such as intrasubject variance only day I data were subjected to a multiple regression analysis to determine the final test battery. Methods of scoring, such as summing the number of responses (fluency), computing frequency of occurrence (originality), and combining the fluency and originality scores were investigated. Three test forms, each measuring a different aspect of motor creativity, emerged from the analysis. ...