Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models
Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
复制
发表时间：
1996-10-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Raney, GE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rayner, K;Sereno, SC;Raney, GE
人们提出了两类模型来解释阅读过程中的眼球运动控制。第一类模型的支持者声称，何时移动眼球的决定（反映在注视持续时间上）主要受在线语言处理的状态影响，比如词汇提取。然而，第二类模型的支持者认为：（a）较低级的眼球运动因素，比如注视位置，决定了何时移动眼球；（b）词汇变量只产生微弱的影响。在这项研究中，对低频和高频目标词的注视持续时间根据注视位置以及对目标词的注视次数进行了检验。数据与眼球运动模型不一致。
Two classes of models have been proposed to account for eye movement control during reading. Proponents of the Ist class of model claim that the decision of when to move the eyes (reflected in fixation duration) is primarily influenced by the status of on-line language processing such as lexical access. Supporters of the 2nd class of model, however, maintain that (a) lower level oculomotor factors such as fixation location govern the decision of when to move the eyes and (b) lexical variables exert only a weak influence, In this study, fixation duration on low- and high-frequency target words was examined as a function of fixation location and the number of fixations on a target word. The data are inconsistent with an oculomotor model.