Comparing de novo genome assembly: the long and short of it.
Comparing de novo genome assembly: the long and short of it.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0019175
复制
发表时间:
2011-04-29
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Mishra B
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Narzisi G;Mishra B
Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology and their focal role in Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have rekindled a growing interest in the whole-genome sequence assembly (WGSA) problem, thereby, inundating the field with a plethora of new formalizations, algorithms, heuristics and implementations. And yet, scant attention has been paid to comparative assessments of these assemblers' quality and accuracy. No commonly accepted and standardized method for comparison exists yet. Even worse, widely used metrics to compare the assembled sequences emphasize only size, poorly capturing the contig quality and accuracy. This paper addresses these concerns: it highlights common anomalies in assembly accuracy through a rigorous study of several assemblers, compared under both standard metrics (N50, coverage, contig sizes, etc.) as well as a more comprehensive metric (Feature-Response Curves, FRC) that is introduced here; FRC transparently captures the trade-offs between contigs' quality against their sizes. For this purpose, most of the publicly available major sequence assemblers – both for low-coverage long (Sanger) and high-coverage short (Illumina) reads technologies – are compared. These assemblers are applied to microbial (Escherichia coli, Brucella, Wolbachia, Staphylococcus, Helicobacter) and partial human genome sequences (Chr. Y), using sequence reads of various read-lengths, coverages, accuracies, and with and without mate-pairs. It is hoped that, based on these evaluations, computational biologists will identify innovative sequence assembly paradigms, bioinformaticists will determine promising approaches for developing “next-generation” assemblers, and biotechnologists will formulate more meaningful design desiderata for sequencing technology platforms. A new software tool for computing the FRC metric has been developed and is available through the AMOS open-source consortium.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
48
作者:
Kidd, Jeffrey M.;Sampas, Nick;Antonacci, Francesca;Graves, Tina;Fulton, Robert;Hayden, Hillary S.;Alkan, Can;Malig, Maika;Ventura, Mario;Giannuzzi, Giuliana;Kallicki, Joelle;Anderson, Paige;Tsalenko, Anya;Yamada, N. Alice;Tsang, Peter;Kaul, Rajinder;Wilson, Richard K.;Bruhn, Laurakay;Eichler, Evan E.
通讯作者:
Eichler, Evan E.
影响因子:
7
作者:
Chaisson, Mark J.;Pevzner, Pavel A.
通讯作者:
Pevzner, Pavel A.
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Boisvert, Sebastien;Laviolette, Francois;Corbeil, Jacques
通讯作者:
Corbeil, Jacques
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Ariyaratne, Pramila Nuwantha;Sung, Wing-Kin
通讯作者:
Sung, Wing-Kin
影响因子:
3
作者:
Hossain MS;Azimi N;Skiena S
通讯作者:
Skiena S