Peritoneal ventilation with oxygen improves outcome after hemorrhagic shock in rats
Peritoneal ventilation with oxygen improves outcome after hemorrhagic shock in rats
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/00003246-200012000-00027
复制
发表时间:
2000-12-01
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Eshel, G
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barr, J;Prueckner, S;Eshel, G
Objective: In experimental pulmonary consolidation with hypoxemia in rabbits, peritoneal ventilation (PV) with 100% oxygen (PV-O-2) improved Pao(2). We hypothesized that PV-O-2 could improve outcome after hemorrhagic shock (HS) with normal lungs, by mitigating dysoxia of the abdominal viscera,Design: Randomized, controlled, laboratory animal study.Setting: University animal research facility.Subjective: Male Sprague-Dawley rats.Interventions: Thirty rats under light anesthesia (N2O/oxygen plus halothane) and spontaneous breathing underwent blood withdrawal of 3 mL/100 g over 15 mins. After volume-controlled Us phase 1 of 60 mins, resuscitation phase 2 of 60 mins included infusion of shed blood and, if necessary, additional lactated Ringer's solution intravenously to control normotension from 60 to 120 mins. This was followed by observation phase 3 for 7 days. We randomized three groups of ten rats each: group I received PV-O-2, starting at 15 mins of Us at a rate of 40 inflations/min, and a peritoneal "tidal volume" of 6 mt, until the end of phase 2. Group II received the same PV with room air (PV-Air). Control group III was treated without PV.Measurements and Main Results: During the second half of Us phase 1, mean arterial pressures were higher in the PV-O-2 group I compared with the PV-Air group II and control group III (p < .05). All 30 rats survived the 120 mins of phases 1 and 2, survival to 7 days was achieved by ten of ten rats in PV-O-2 group I; by nine of ten in PV-Air group II; and by five of ten in control group III (p < .05 vs. group I; NS vs. group II). survival times of