A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/jrsm.1123
复制
发表时间：
2014-12
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
McEwen, Scott A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pham, Mai T.;Rajic, Andrijana;Greig, Judy D.;Sargeant, Jan M.;Papadopoulos, Andrew;McEwen, Scott A.
范围审查已成为一种越来越流行的综合研究证据的方法。这是一种相对较新的方法，尚未建立通用的研究定义或明确的程序。本次范围界定审查的目的是提供文献中范围界定审查的概述。使用Arksey和O'Malley框架进行了范围界定审查。在四个书目数据库和灰色文献中进行检索，以确定范围审查研究。由两名独立评审员使用预先测试的表格进行评审选择和表征。检索识别出1999年至2012年10月发表的344篇范围界定综述。这些审查在目的、方法和报告细节方面各不相同。近四分之三的评论（74.1%）涉及健康主题。研究完成时间从2周到20个月不等，51%的人使用了已发表的方法框架。很少对纳入研究进行质量评估（22.38%）。范围界定审查是一种相对较新但日益普遍的确定广泛专题的方法。由于他们的行为各不相同，有必要使他们的方法标准化，以确保证据的效用和力度。版权所有© 2014作者.由John Wiley & Sons，Ltd.出版的研究合成方法。
The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature. A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search was conducted in four bibliographic databases and the gray literature to identify scoping review studies. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. The search identified 344 scoping reviews published from 1999 to October 2012. The reviews varied in terms of purpose, methodology, and detail of reporting. Nearly three-quarter of reviews (74.1%) addressed a health topic. Study completion times varied from 2 weeks to 20 months, and 51% utilized a published methodological framework. Quality assessment of included studies was infrequently performed (22.38%). Scoping reviews are a relatively new but increasingly common approach for mapping broad topics. Because of variability in their conduct, there is a need for their methodological standardization to ensure the utility and strength of evidence. © 2014 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Armstrong, Rebecca;Hall, Belinda J.;Waters, Elizabeth
通讯作者：
Waters, Elizabeth
影响因子：
4
作者：
Anderson, Stuart;Allen, Pauline;Goodwin, Nick
通讯作者：
Goodwin, Nick
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Brearley, S. G.;Stamataki, Z.;Amir, Z.
通讯作者：
Amir, Z.
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Churchill, Paige;Otal, Damanjot;Walton, J. Mark
通讯作者：
Walton, J. Mark
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
Betz, SF;Reinhart, GJ;Struthers, RS
通讯作者：
Struthers, RS