Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom
Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x
复制
发表时间：
2005-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Wright;I. Filatotchev;R. Hoskisson;Mike W. Peng
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Wright;I. Filatotchev;R. Hoskisson;Mike W. Peng
这篇评论和对“新兴经济体战略研究”特刊的介绍，探讨了迄今为止关于新兴经济体战略的理论贡献的性质。我们将研究分为四个战略选择：（1）来自发达经济体的企业进入新兴经济体;（2）国内企业在新兴经济体内部竞争;（3）来自新兴经济体的企业进入其他新兴经济体;（4）来自新兴经济体的企业进入发达经济体。在四种观点（制度理论、交易成本理论、资源基础理论和代理理论）中，最占主导地位的似乎是制度理论。大多数现有的研究，作出了贡献，混合制度理论与其他三个角度之一，包括七个八篇论文包括在这个特刊。我们建议未来的研究议程围绕四个战略和四个理论视角。鉴于迄今为止对第一和第二战略选择的研究相对强调，我们认为，对第三和第四战略选择的研究范围越来越大。
This review and introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies’ considers the nature of theoretical contributions thus far on strategy in emerging economies. We classify the research through four strategic options: (1) firms from developed economies entering emerging economies; (2) domestic firms competing within emerging economies; (3) firms from emerging economies entering other emerging economies; and (4) firms from emerging economies entering developed economies. Among the four perspectives examined (institutional theory, transaction cost theory, resource-based theory, and agency theory), the most dominant seems to be institutional theory. Most existing studies that make a contribution blend institutional theory with one of the other three perspectives, including seven out of the eight papers included in this Special Issue. We suggest a future research agenda based around the four strategies and four theoretical perspectives. Given the relative emphasis of research so far on the first and second strategic options, we believe that there is growing scope for research that addresses the third and fourth.