Tradeoff between stability and multispecificity in the design of promiscuous proteins.
Tradeoff between stability and multispecificity in the design of promiscuous proteins.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000627
复制
发表时间:
2009-12
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Shifman JM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fromer M;Shifman JM
Natural proteins often partake in several highly specific protein-protein interactions. They are thus subject to multiple opposing forces during evolutionary selection. To be functional, such multispecific proteins need to be stable in complex with each interaction partner, and, at the same time, to maintain affinity toward all partners. How is this multispecificity acquired through natural evolution? To answer this compelling question, we study a prototypical multispecific protein, calmodulin (CaM), which has evolved to interact with hundreds of target proteins. Starting from high-resolution structures of sixteen CaM-target complexes, we employ state-of-the-art computational methods to predict a hundred CaM sequences best suited for interaction with each individual CaM target. Then, we design CaM sequences most compatible with each possible combination of two, three, and all sixteen targets simultaneously, producing almost 70,000 low energy CaM sequences. By comparing these sequences and their energies, we gain insight into how nature has managed to find the compromise between the need for favorable interaction energies and the need for multispecificity. We observe that designing for more partners simultaneously yields CaM sequences that better match natural sequence profiles, thus emphasizing the importance of such strategies in nature. Furthermore, we show that the CaM binding interface can be nicely partitioned into positions that are critical for the affinity of all CaM-target complexes and those that are molded to provide interaction specificity. We reveal several basic categories of sequence-level tradeoffs that enable the compromise necessary for the promiscuity of this protein. We also thoroughly quantify the tradeoff between interaction energetics and multispecificity and find that facilitating seemingly competing interactions requires only a small deviation from optimal energies. We conclude that multispecific proteins have been subjected to a rigorous optimization process that has fine-tuned their sequences for interactions with a precise set of targets, thus conferring their multiple cellular functions. In nature, some proteins are more social than others, interacting with a large number of partners. These “promiscuous” proteins play key roles in cellular signaling pathways whose disruption may lead to diseases such as cancer. The amino acid sequences of such proteins must have evolved to be optimal for combined interactions with all natural partners. However, the evolutionary process leading to this promiscuity is not fully understood. We address this subject by predicting amino acid sequences that would be most compatible for interaction with each partner on its own and those most compatible for binding multiple proteins. We find that these two types of sequences are substantially different, the latter more closely resembling the natural sequences of promiscuous proteins. We also find that promiscuous proteins contain certain regions that are necessary for interfacing with all of their partners, while other regions convey specific interactions with each particular target protein. We analyze the tradeoffs required for such proteins to bind multiple partners and find that only some degree of compromise is typically needed in order to permit interactions that are seemingly antagonistic. We conclude that the simulations reported here mimic well the natural evolution of proteins that associate with multiple partners.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Berezovsky, Igor N.;Zeldovich, Konstantin B.;Shakhnovich, Eugene I.
通讯作者:
Shakhnovich, Eugene I.
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Dahiyat, BI;Mayo, SL
通讯作者:
Mayo, SL
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0506124102
发表时间:
2005-09-06
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Bolon, DN;Grant, RA;Sauer, RT
通讯作者:
Sauer, RT
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Grigoryan, Gevorg;Reinke, Aaron W.;Keating, Amy E.
通讯作者:
Keating, Amy E.
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Barabási, AL;Albert, R
通讯作者:
Albert, R