Limitations of parallel global optimization for large-scale human movement problems.

Limitations of parallel global optimization for large-scale human movement problems.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.010
复制
发表时间:
2009-06
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Fregly BJ
Fregly BJ
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Koh BI;Reinbolt JA;George AD;Haftka RT;Fregly BJ

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

Global optimization algorithms (e.g., simulated annealing, genetic, and particle swarm) have been gaining popularity in biomechanics research, in part due to advances in parallel computing. To date, such algorithms have only been applied to small- or medium-scale optimization problems (< 100 design variables). This study evaluates the applicability of a parallel particle swarm global optimization algorithm to large-scale human movement problems. The evaluation was performed using two large-scale (660 design variables) optimization problems that utilized a dynamic, 27 degree-of-freedom, full-body gait model to predict new gait motions from a nominal gait motion. Both cost functions minimized a quantity that reduced the knee adduction torque. The first one minimized foot path errors corresponding to an increased toe out angle of 15 deg, while the second one minimized the knee adduction torque directly without changing the foot path. Constraints on allowable changes in trunk orientation, joint angles, joint torques, centers of pressure, and ground reactions were handled using a penalty method. For both problems, a single run with a gradient-based nonlinear least squares algorithm found a significantly better solution than did 10 runs with the global particle swarm algorithm. Due to the penalty terms, the physically-realistic gradient-based solutions were located within a narrow “channel” in design space that was difficult to enter without gradient information. Researchers should exercise caution when extrapolating the performance of parallel global optimizers to human movement problems with hundreds of design variables, especially when penalty terms are included in the cost function.
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100140218
发表时间: 1996-03-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Andrews, M;Noyes, FR;Andriacchi, TP
通讯作者: Andriacchi, TP
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.08.010
发表时间: 2005-09-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Higginson, JS;Neptune, RR;Anderson, FC
通讯作者: Anderson, FC
DOI: 10.1115/1.1634282
发表时间: 2003-12-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
McLean, SG;Su, A;van den Bogert, AJ
通讯作者: van den Bogert, AJ
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021111421247
发表时间: 2002-11-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Lo, J;Huang, G;Metaxas, D
通讯作者: Metaxas, D
DOI: 10.1115/1.2794185
发表时间: 1995-08-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
TASHMAN, S;ZAJAC, FE;PERKASH, I
通讯作者: PERKASH, I