Advocating Co-Productive Engagement with Marginalised People: A specific perspective on and by survivors of childhood sexual abuse
Advocating Co-Productive Engagement with Marginalised People: A specific perspective on and by survivors of childhood sexual abuse
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/bjsw/bcx149
复制
发表时间：
2018-10-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Moss, Sally
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fisher, Pamela;Balfour, Bob;Moss, Sally
联合制作作为公共政策改革的一个关键方面在地球仪上越来越受欢迎。本文认为，有利于社会福利的共同生产的原则，并建议，促进民主关系更有可能使代理和儿童性虐待的受害者-幸存者的恢复。该文件，基于一个autoethnographical方法，可能是相关的社会护理从业者谁与一系列边缘化的人，特别是在自由的国家，促进组织文化塑造不成比例的风险。风险文化，有人认为，促进权力平衡和其他可以说是一个制度的延续原来的滥用。另一方面，共同制作有可能通过经验使专门知识合法化，使受害者-幸存者能够恢复为公民，并享有相关的参与权。该文件随后得出了一些好处的合作生产从业人员的专业参与可能会被扼杀。我们认为，共同制作可能指向实践的基础上，通过经验和社会团结的专业知识的价值。
Co-production is gaining ground as a key dimension of public policy reform across the globe. This paper argues in favour of social welfare shaped by the principles of co-production and suggests that the promotion of democratic relationships is more likely to enable the agency and recovery of victim-survivors of childhood sexual abuse. The paper, based on an autoethnographical approach, is likely to be of relevance to social care practitioners who work with a range of marginalised people, particularly in liberal states that promote organisational cultures shaped disproportionately by risk. Cultures of risk, it is argued, promote power balances and othering-arguably an institutional perpetuation of the original abuse. Co-production, on the other hand, has the potential to legitimise expertise by experience, enabling victim-survivors to be reinstated as citizens with associated rights of participation. The paper subsequently draws out some of the benefits of co-production for practitioners whose professional engagement may be stifled. We suggest that co-production potentially points towards practice based on the valuing of expertise by experience and social solidarity.