Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: a reply to Block.
Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: a reply to Block.
复制标题
个性湿地的坚实基础：对布洛克的答复。
作者：
P. Costa;R. McCrae
人格的五因素模型（FFM）提供了一个关于人格特质的五个广泛因素的结构组织。布洛克（1995）对FFM的批评未能认识到特质分类的效用和旨在检验5因素假设的研究意图。在许多情况下，他没有提到解决他提出的关切的经验证据;这些证据表明，除了他所审查的词汇和问卷传统之外，实况调查表得到了强有力的支持。他提出的许多关于提高人格研究质量的建议都很有价值，但如果将这些建议与人格特质结构的既定知识（即FFM）结合起来使用，可能会更有成效。
The five-factor model (FFM) of personality offers a structural organization of personality traits in terms of 5 broad factors. J. Block's (1995) critique of the FFM failed to recognize the utility of a trait taxonomy and the intent of research designed to test the 5-factor hypothesis. In a number of instances he omitted reference to empirical evidence that addresses concerns he raised; this evidence shows strong support for the FFM beyond the lexical and questionnaire traditions he reviews. Many of his suggestions for improving the quality of personality research are valuable, but are likely to be more fruitful when used in conjunction with established knowledge about the structure of personality traits: the FFM.