Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
Power Doppler sonography: Anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.12.007
复制
发表时间:
2009-04-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Kizilkaya, Esref
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gokalp, Gokhan;Topal, Ugur;Kizilkaya, Esref
Objective: To evaluate the contribution of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) to breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasonography (BI-RADS US) categorization of solid breast masses.Materials and methods: Totally 94 solid lesions with histopathological results in 49 patients were included in the study. US features of the lesions were classified according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) BI-RADS US lexicon. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively according to their PDUS properties and quantitatively with spectral analysis. Hypervascularity, penetration of vessels into the mass or branching-disordered course and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 were accepted as probable malignant criteria.Results: Fifty-five of 94 lesions were benign (58.5%), while 39 (41.5%) were malignant histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of US and PDUS in the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 100%, 58.2%, 62.9%, 100% and 71.8%, 81.8%, 73.7%, 80.4%, respectively. Criteria used for the distinction of malignant and benign lesions like number of vessels (p < 0.05), distribution of tumoral vessels, morphology of vessels and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When sonographic findings were combined with PDUS and spectral analysis findings, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 52.7%, 60% and 100%, respectively.Conclusion: PDUS and spectral analysis have no contribution to BI-RADS US. For the spectral analysis, when RI value is one or greater, malignancy risk significantly increases. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.