Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association Classification Standards with the 1996 guidelines
Comparison of the revised 2000 American Spinal Injury Association Classification Standards with the 1996 guidelines
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00002060-200207000-00006
复制
发表时间：
2002-07-01
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Millis, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kirshblum, SC;Memmo, P;Millis, S
目的：本研究旨在确定美国脊髓损伤协会国际标准（2000年）的最新变化与之前（1996年）的分类之间的一致程度。设计：在一家脊髓损伤康复医院，收集了94名受试者的数据，这些受试者在受伤后1周内根据国际标准进行了首次神经系统检查，并在1年后再次进行了神经系统检查。比较了1996年和2000年修订的运动不完全程度分类的一致性，以及基于首次检查预测1年预后的能力。结果：1996年和2000年修订的运动不完全性损伤分类指南几乎完全一致，在初步检查的基础上，1年后神经系统恢复的预后没有统计学上的显著差异。结论：2000年修订版在美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分类或预测1年神经系统恢复方面没有显著差异。
Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the level of agreement between the most recent change in the American Spinal Injury Association International Standards (2000) and the previous (11996) classification.Design: In a spinal cord injury rehabilitation hospital, data were collected on 94 subjects who had an initial neurologic examination according to the International Standards within 1 wk of injury and again at 1 yr. Comparisons were examined of the level of agreement between the 1996 and 2000 revisions in classification of the motor incomplete levels and ability to prognosticate outcome at 1 yr on the basis of the initial examination.Results: Near perfect agreement between the 1996 and 2000 revised guidelines in the classification of motor incomplete injuries was found, with no statistically significant difference for prognosticating neurologic recovery at 1 yr on the basis of the initial examination.Conclusion: The 2000 revisions do not offer a significant difference in American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification or in predicting neurologic recovery at 1 yr.