TURBIDITY MEASUREMENTS OF BACTERIAL CULTURES IN SOME AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENTS
TURBIDITY MEASUREMENTS OF BACTERIAL CULTURES IN SOME AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENTS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0003-2697(70)90174-0
复制
发表时间:
1970-01-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
KOCH, AL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
KOCH, AL
Almost every student of bacterial physiology and biochemistry assesses the bacterial concentration by the turbidity of the liquid cultures as indicated by measurements in instruments primarily design for the measurement of absorbance. Every type of calorimeter or spectroph, otometer has been used for this purpose. Often the experimenter does not test the proportionality, precision, accuracy, and range of applicability of such measurements. We bring together here theoretical and experimental studies of the light scattering of bacteria (l-3) and unpublished observations on the practicalities imposed by readily available commerical apparatus.The majority of light scattered by, a bacterial suspension is scattered at angles th, at deviate only a few degrees from the original direction of propagation of the incident light beam (see Fig. 3 of ref. 1). Thus, the major factor that determines the sensitivity of turbidity measurements is the sangular, aperature viewed by the phototube. An ideal turbidimeter, being one with a well collimated beam and an infinitely small phototube, would receive none of the scattered light. This means that the apparent absorbance which is a measure of loss from the primary beam due to light scattering when measured in ordinary spectrophotometers and calorimeters is less than that due to the total light scattered, since a portion of the scattered light still falls upon the detector. The high directional orientation of forward scattered light also leads to increased deviations from the analog of the Beer-Lambert law, ie, at high concentrations of bacterial cells, part of the light scattered (out of view of the detector) by one bacterium will be secondarily scattered by another and reoriented so that it falls upon the detector. It is therefore evident that the standard curves of the apparent absorbance (= A) versus mg dry weight of bacterial/ml(= w) will