L'inchiostro dei vinti. Stampa e ideologia neofascista 1945-1953, by Elisabetta Cassina Wolff, Milan, Mursia, 2013, 398 pp., €18.00, ISBN 97-888-425-4558-3
L'inchiostro dei vinti. Stampa e ideologia neofascista 1945-1953, by Elisabetta Cassina Wolff, Milan, Mursia, 2013, 398 pp., €18.00, ISBN 97-888-425-4558-3
复制标题
Linchiostro dei vinti。
DOI：
10.1080/13532944.2013.841011
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
De Nardi S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De Nardi S
在她的书中，Cassina Wolff带领我们穿越了墨索里尼的意大利社会主义党（RSI）垮台和第二次世界大战结束后所谓的新法西斯主义者的意识形态趋势，立场和愿望。书名与詹保罗·潘萨（Gianpaolo Pansa）2003年的修正主义畅销书《葡萄酒之血》（Il sangue dei vinti）相呼应，尽管其范围和质量已经无法再进一步去除。卡西娜·沃尔夫（Cassina Wolff）通过早期的免责声明声明确保读者确切地知道他们可以接触到什么样的材料。调查的范围在主题意义上（意识形态被彻底探索，但不是意识形态对政治活动本身的影响）和样本量上都有很好的定义：虽然她集中在1945-1953年，但她处理了广泛的新法西斯标题和出版物（大约70）。Cassina Wolff将她的抽样策略解释为保持一致的决定，明确关注特定和明确的意识形态高于其他任何东西。附录提供了一个有趣的出版物和文件的样本，她查阅和引用，从ventennio（如1927年的Carta del Lavoro）到RSI。除了其内在的历史价值外，完整地复制文件和论文特别有助于理解和浏览各种新法西斯主义作者提出的各种态度、趋势和批评，他们的著作按主题而不是按时间顺序在作品的主体中进行了有益的分组。提供了一个横截面的证词agguerriti法西斯理论家（其中包括Pini，Cione，Pettinato，Costamagna，Soffici，di Lauro，Evola，Massi和Erra），这本书展示了新法西斯主义信条的折衷性质，远离怀旧，反动的画笔，它经常被描绘成主流反法西斯抵抗文化：如果说有什么不同的话，那就是该运动的拥护者们“对未来充满了怀旧之情”（第269页）。
In her book, Cassina Wolff takes us on a journey through the ideological trends, stances and aspirations of so-called neo-Fascists in the aftermath of the fall of Mussolini’s Repubblica Sociale Italiana (RSI) and the end of the Second World War. The title echoes Gianpaolo Pansa’s revisionist bestseller Il sangue dei vinti (2003), although the scope–and quality of scholarship–could not be further removed.Cassina Wolff ensures through early disclaimers that the reader knows exactly what kind of material they can expect to engage with. The scope of the investigation is well defined both in a thematic sense (ideology is thoroughly explored, but not the ideological influences on political activism per se) and in its sample size: although she concentrates on the years 1945–1953, she tackles a wide spectrum of neo-Fascist titles and publications (circa 70). Cassina Wolff explains her sampling strategy as a decision to maintain a consistent, clear focus on the specifically and explicitly ideological above anything else. The appendix offers an interesting sample of the publications and documents she consulted and cited, dating from the ventennio (eg the 1927 Carta del Lavoro) to the RSI. The reproduction of documents and papers in their entirety, aside from their intrinsic historic value, is particularly helpful in understanding and navigating through the array of attitudes, trends and critiques offered by the various neo-Fascist authors, whose writings are helpfully grouped by themes rather than chronologically in the main body of the work. Offering a cross-section of testimonies of agguerriti Fascist theoreticians (among others, Pini, Cione, Pettinato, Costamagna, Soffici, di Lauro, Evola, Massi, and Erra), the book demonstrates the eclectic nature of the neo-Fascist credo, far from the nostalgic, reactionary brush it is often painted with in the mainstream anti-Fascist Resistance culture: if anything, the movement’s champions were ‘nostalgic for the future’(p. 269).