Commentaries on our new ways of perceiving disasters
Commentaries on our new ways of perceiving disasters
复制标题
关于我们认识灾难的新方式的评论
DOI：
10.1108/17595901011056677
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Korstanje
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Korstanje
目的 – 本文的目的是帮助读者更多地了解恐怖、风险和威胁感知的新现象。设计/方法论/途径 – 评论了不同的作者：Castel、Beck、Baral、Kellner、Sabada、Korstanje，特别是 Baudrillard。调查结果 – 在评论的作者中发现了一些匹配项，其中包括，例如：晚期现代性（从 1970 年至今） 目睹社会想象中恐惧、恐慌和风险评估的增加；这些担忧是未来应对意外事件的过程的一部分。这样，人类的决策过程就可以揭示生活的某些方面，例如健康、身体护理计划，但这也有其阴暗面；尽管现代国家负责保障稳定和安全，但外部危险却超出了其应对能力。每当人际关系崩溃时，就会出现一种新的焦虑情绪。原创性/价值——这篇论文是来自人类学家的有趣评论/所以……
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to help readers gain more understanding of the new phenomena of terror, risk, and threat perception.Design/methodology/approach – Various authors are reviewed: Castel, Beck, Baral, Kellner, Sabada, Korstanje, and in particular, Baudrillard.Findings – Several matches are found among the reviewed authors which comprise, for example: late modernity (from 1970 to date) witnesses an increase of fears, panic, and risk assessments in social imaginary; these concerns are part of a process that opens the future to the contingency. That way, the decision‐making process in human beings sheds light on certain aspects of life such as health, body‐care planning but this has a dark side; even though the modern state is in charge of warranting the stability and security, external dangers override their capacities of response. An emergent sentiment of anxiety arises whenever human relations collapse.Originality/value – This paper is an interesting commentary from an anthropologist/so...