Usability comparison of three clinical trial management systems
Usability comparison of three clinical trial management systems
复制标题
三种临床试验管理系统的可用性比较
DOI：
10.2337/diabetes.48.1.223
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Clauw
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Byungsuk Choi;S. Drozdetski;Margrethe Hackett;Can Lu;Cari Rottenberg;L. Yu;Dale A. Hunscher;D. Clauw
为了在选择临床试验管理系统（CTMS）时提供建议，我们评估了三个候选应用程序。在初步分析后，我们进行了启发式评估和可用性测试，以评估系统的可用性。Velos eResearch是一个商业CTMS，尽管相比之下功能较少，但其可用性结果最好。在决策过程中，“易用性”方面比功能更受重视。
To advise in the selection of a clinical trial management system (CTMS), we evaluated three candidate applications. After preliminary analyses,we performed heuristic evaluation and usability testing to assess system's usability. Velos eResearch,a commercial CTMS, had the best usability outcome despite having fewer features in comparison. In the decision process, the "ease-of-use" aspect was more valued than functionality.