Developing European indicators of trust in justice

Developing European indicators of trust in justice
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1477370811411458
复制
发表时间:
2011-07
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
J. Jackson;B. Bradford;M. Hough;J. Kuha;S. Stares;S. Widdop;R. Fitzgerald;M. Yordanova;T. Galev
J. Jackson;B. Bradford;M. Hough;J. Kuha;S. Stares;S. Widdop;R. Fitzgerald;M. Yordanova;T. Galev
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Jackson;B. Bradford;M. Hough;J. Kuha;S. Stares;S. Widdop;R. Fitzgerald;M. Yordanova;T. Galev

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

对司法信任的社会指标方法认识到,警察和刑事法院如果要有效和公平地运作,就需要公众的支持和体制的合法性。为了促成公众的合作和遵守,这些机构必须向公民证明它们是值得信赖的,它们拥有治理的权力。在本文中,我们首先概述了当前司法信任比较分析的概念路线图。然后,我们描述了欧洲社会调查第5轮中45个项目模块的方法开发过程,该模块涵盖了核心调查指标。在介绍了指标定量试点的结果后,我们考虑了刑事司法程序司法模型的政策含义。
A social indicators approach to trust in justice recognizes that the police and criminal courts need public support and institutional legitimacy if they are to operate effectively and fairly. In order to generate public cooperation and compliance, these institutions must demonstrate to citizens that they are trustworthy and that they possess the authority to govern. In this paper we first outline the conceptual roadmap for a current comparative analysis of trust in justice. We then describe the methodological development process of a 45-item module in Round 5 of the European Social Survey, which fields the core survey indicators. After presenting the findings from a quantitative pilot of the indicators, we consider the policy implications of a procedural justice model of criminal justice.