Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: testing three explanations.
Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: testing three explanations.
复制标题
性侵犯男性对女性交流的看法：检验三种解释。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.699
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Brown,LM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Malamuth,NM;Brown,LM
测试了 3 种解释，发现性攻击性强的男性对女性交流的看法与攻击性较低的男性不同。第一个表明攻击者没有能力解读女性的负面情绪。第二个假设是，他们未能对女性的友善和诱惑、自信和敌意之间做出微妙的区分。第三种解释认为，性侵犯者使用可疑的图式，因此低估了女性交流的真实性。这些解释通过录像场景进行了检验，在录像场景中，女性对男性的挑逗的反应有系统地变化。数据最支持可疑模式的解释。这些发现与其他关于性侵犯者特征以及对攻击性儿童和婚姻暴力男性的看法的研究相结合。还讨论了干预措施的影响。（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
Tested 3 explanations of findings that sexually aggressive men perceive women's communications differently than less aggressive men. The 1st suggests that aggressors are incompetent in decoding women's negative emotions. The 2nd posits that they fail to make subtle distinctions between women's friendliness and seductiveness and between assertiveness and hostility. The 3rd explanation contends that sexual aggressors use a suspicious schema and therefore discount the veridicality of women's communications. These explanations were tested using videotaped scenarios in which a woman's responses to a man's advances were systematically varied. The data were most supportive of the suspicious schema explanation. These findings are integrated with other research on the characteristics of sexual aggressors and on the perceptions of aggressive children and of maritally violent men. Implications for interventions are also discussed.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)