Perceptual consequences of interocular differences in the duration of temporal integration.
Perceptual consequences of interocular differences in the duration of temporal integration.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1167/jov.22.12.12
复制
发表时间:
2022-11-01
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Temporal differences in visual information processing between the eyes can cause dramatic misperceptions of motion and depth. Processing delays between the eyes cause the Pulfrich effect: oscillating targets in the frontal plane are misperceived as moving along near-elliptical motion trajectories in depth (Pulfrich, 1922). Here, we explain a previously reported but poorly understood variant: the anomalous Pulfrich effect. When this variant is perceived, the illusory motion trajectory appears oriented left- or right-side back in depth, rather than aligned with the true direction of motion. Our data indicate that this perceived misalignment is due to interocular differences in neural temporal integration periods, as opposed to interocular differences in delay. For oscillating motion, differences in the duration of temporal integration dampen the effective motion amplitude in one eye relative to the other. In a dynamic analog of the Geometric effect in stereo-surface-orientation perception (Ogle, 1950), the different motion amplitudes cause the perceived misorientation of the motion trajectories. Forced-choice psychophysical experiments, conducted with both different spatial frequencies and different onscreen motion damping in the two eyes show that the perceived misorientation in depth is associated with the eye having greater motion damping. A target-tracking experiment provided more direct evidence that the anomalous Pulfrich effect is caused by interocular differences in temporal integration and delay. These findings highlight the computational hurdles posed to the visual system by temporal differences in sensory processing. Future work will explore how the visual system overcomes these challenges to achieve accurate perception.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Adams WJ;Elder JH;Graf EW;Leyland J;Lugtigheid AJ;Muryy A
通讯作者:
Muryy A
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Burge J;McCann BC;Geisler WS
通讯作者:
Geisler WS
DOI:
10.3758/bf03199861
发表时间:
1979-01-01
期刊:
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
影响因子:
--
作者:
BLAKE, R;CORMACK, RH
通讯作者:
CORMACK, RH
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Burge, Johannes;Geisler, Wilson S.
通讯作者:
Geisler, Wilson S.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1108491108
发表时间:
2011-10-04
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Burge, Johannes;Geisler, Wilson S.
通讯作者:
Geisler, Wilson S.