Agreement between two measures of alcohol consumption.
Agreement between two measures of alcohol consumption.
复制标题
两种酒精消耗量指标之间的协议。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Gibberd
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Redman;R. Sanson;C. Wilkinson;P. Fahey;R. Gibberd
将数量频率问卷 (QF) 的回答与自我报告日记的回答进行比较。 778 名全科医生在就诊前进行了 QF，这些患者在 24 小时内在家中完成了日记。该日记高估了人口中相对于 QF 的不饮酒者数量，并将较高比例的患者归类为酗酒者。 QF 未能检测到日记中确定的 78% 的重度饮酒者。据报道，日记中的总体饮酒量（平均每周 10.51 杯）明显多于 QF（平均每周 6.87 杯）。两项措施的响应之间的关系是非线性的。在低消费水平时，患者在日记中表示饮酒量是 QF 上的两倍，但报告的消费差异幅度随着消费水平的增加而减小。讨论了结果对酒精消费自我报告测量的影响。
Responses on the Quantity-Frequency Questionnaire (QF) were compared with those on the self-report diary. The QF was administered to 778 general practice patients prior to their consultation and the same patients completed the diary at home within 24 hours. The diary overestimated the number of nondrinkers in the population relative to the QF and classified a higher proportion of patients as heavy drinkers. The QF failed to detect 78% of heavy drinkers identified by the diary. Significantly (p less than .001) more alcohol was reported to be consumed overall on the diary (mean, 10.51 drinks/week) than on the QF (mean, 6.87 drinks/week). The relationship between responses on the two measures was nonlinear. At low consumption levels patients indicated drinking twice as much on the diary as on the QF, but the magnitude of the reported consumption difference decreased with increasing consumption levels. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for self-report measures of alcohol consumption.