Relationalities and convergences in food security narratives: towards a place-based approach
Relationalities and convergences in food security narratives: towards a place-based approach
复制标题
粮食安全叙述中的关系和趋同：采取基于地方的方法
DOI：
10.1111/tran.12137
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Ana Moragues
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Sonnino;T. Marsden;Ana Moragues
本文讨论了新出现的呼吁，加强不同的粮食安全话语之间的关系和趋同。基于对不同的叙述和概念的批判性分析，随着时间的推移，被部署到解决粮食安全问题，本文问：如何，以及在何种程度上，可以对粮食安全的不同叙述及其不同的假设被整合，以创造一个环境，促进粮食系统活动之间的更紧密的联系和更强大的关系，其行为者之间？为了解决这一问题，本文重点关注粮食安全不同叙述中的治理框架，即不同粮食系统参与者的作用，他们对权利和责任的不同看法，以及为实现集体目标而优先考虑的互动类型。分析揭示了生产主义，粮食主权，生计安全，食物权，粮食民主，粮食公民身份和社区粮食安全，这是不同的概念框架的局限性，我们认为，往往被锁定到固定水平的规模和概括以及对立的假设。正如该文件的结论所述，完善粮食安全议程的努力应首先认识到地方是关键和积极的中观层面的调解人-即作为围绕更有效的粮食生产-消费关系重新组合资源的渐进式游说，作为多尺度理论透镜，它提供了在总体粮食安全辩论中建立更大的复杂性和多样性的概念优势。
This paper addresses emerging calls for an enhanced relationality and convergence across different food security discourses. Based on a critical analysis of different narratives and concepts that have, over time, been deployed to address the food security problem, this paper asks: How, and to what extent, can the different narratives on food security and their different postulates be integrated to create a context that fosters closer connections between food system activities and more empowered relations between its actors? To address this question, the paper focuses on the governance frameworks embedded in different narratives on food security – i.e. the role attributed to different food system actors, their diverse views of rights and responsibility, and the types of interactions that are prioritised to achieve collective goals. The analysis exposes the limitations of conceptual frameworks as diverse as productivism, food sovereignty, livelihood security, the right-to-food, food democracy, food citizenship and community food security, which, we argue, tend to be locked into fixed levels of scale and generalised as well as oppositional assumptions. As the paper concludes, efforts to refine the food security agenda should start with a recognition of place as key and active meso-level mediator – that is, as a progressive canvass for reassembling resources around more effective food production–consumption relations and as a multiscalar theoretical lens that offers the conceptual advantage of building far more complexity and diversity into aggregated food security debates.