Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT?
Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.011
复制
发表时间：
2010-03-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Fazio, Russell H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Han, H. Anna;Czellar, Sandor;Fazio, Russell H.
在当前的一组实验中，我们建立并探索了表征内隐联想测验(IAT)中典型使用的属性反应标签的不精确性的后果。在实验1中，我们证明了IAT的延展性，因为传统实施的IAT分数被证明受到由不相关的先前任务诱导的视角心态的影响。然后，我们探索IAT的延展性如何能够导致推断态度改变已经发生，即使有非常好的理由相信它没有发生(实验2)，反之亦然，当态度变化确实可能发生时，它如何能够掩盖这种变化的检测(实验3)我们为这些差异提供了概念性的解释，并建议改进方法以增强IAT措施的特异性(C)2009爱思唯尔公司保留所有权利。
In the current set of experiments, we establish, and explore the consequences of, the imprecision that characterizes the attribute response labels typically employed in the Implicit Association Test (IAT) In Experiment 1, we demonstrate the malleability of the IAT, as conventionally implemented IAT scores are shown to be Influenced by perspective mindsets induced by an unrelated preceding task Then, we explore how the malleability of the IAT can lead to the inference that attitude change has occurred even when there is very good reason to believe it has not (Experiment 2), and conversely, how it can obscure the detection of attitude change when such change is indeed likely to have Occurred (Experiment 3) We provide conceptual explanations for these discrepancies and suggest methodological improvements to enhance the specificity of IAT measures (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.