National Culture and Its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan, 1949–2003
National Culture and Its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan, 1949–2003
复制标题
民族文化及其不满：台湾的遗产和语言政治，1949-2003
DOI：
10.1017/s0010417504000362
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Horng‐luen Wang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Horng‐luen Wang
罗杰斯·布鲁贝克在其开创性的《重塑民族主义》一书中，挑战了对国家和民族主义的传统理解，提出了一种与众不同（如果不是创新的话）的研究方法。最近的理论发展使先前文献中隐含的现实主义本体论成为问题，布鲁贝克呼吁用制度主义的方法来研究国家和民族主义。正如他所指出的那样，国家和国家可以更好地理解为不是实体而是制度化的形式，不是集体而是实践范畴，不是实体而是偶然事件（1996:18）。然后，他运用这种方法来分析苏联的解体。布鲁贝克认为，在苏联，国家和国籍以两种不同的模式制度化：政治-领土模式和民族-个人模式。虽然这两种模式之间的不协调导致了苏联社会内部的紧张和矛盾，但这种制度化的双重遗产，以意想不到的后果表现出来，最终导致了苏联的解体，并继续在今天的继承国中构建民族主义政治。
In his groundbreaking Nationalism Reframed, Rogers Brubaker challenges conventional understandings of nations and nationalism by advancing a distinctive, if not innovative, approach to the subject. Drawing on recent theoretical developments that problematize the realist ontology implicitly assumed in previous literatures, Brubaker calls for an institutionalist approach to the study of nations and nationalism. As he points out, nation and nationhood can be better understood not as substance but as institutionalized form, not as collectivity but as practical category, and not as entity but as contingent event (1996:18). He then employs this approach to analyze the breakdown of the Soviet Union. According to Brubaker, nationhood and nationality were institutionalized in the Soviet Union in two different modes: political-territorial and the ethno-personal. While the incongruence between these two modes led to tensions and contradictions within Soviet society, the dual legacy of such an institutionalization, manifesting itself as unintended consequences, eventually shaped the disintegration of the Soviet Union and continues to structure nationalist politics in the successor states today.