Making the ‘right’ choice based on experiments: regulatory decisions for food and health
Making the ‘right’ choice based on experiments: regulatory decisions for food and health
复制标题
根据实验做出“正确”选择：食品和健康的监管决策
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Marette
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Roosen;S. Marette
这篇文章展示了揭示食品质量和安全信息的实验如何有助于对食品和健康的监管辩论。在详细介绍了食品部门监管的动机之后，我们强调了理论福利分析的局限性。尽管来自行为经济学的挑战，使用实验结果的成本效益分析可以补充理论分析。在对实验室和实地食品实验的简要回顾中，我们讨论了它们的相对优势和劣势，并提出了一种如何将实验数据整合到福利分析中的分析方法。一项实证应用量化并比较了卫生信息和鱼类补贴对福利的影响。
This article shows how experiments revealing information about food quality and safety can contribute to regulatory debates on food and health. After detailing the motivations of regulation for the food sector, we underline the limits of theoretical welfare analysis. Despite challenges from behavioural economics, cost-benefit analysis using experimental results can complement theoretical analysis. In a brief review of laboratory and field experiments with food, we discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses and suggest an analytical approach of how to integrate experimental data into welfare analysis. An empirical application quantifies and compares the welfare impact of health information and a subsidy for fish.
市场模拟和公共产品的提供：对环境评估异常现象的非家长式反应
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Sugden R
通讯作者：
Sugden R