Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
复制标题

胃癌循环肿瘤 DNA 的诊断和预后价值:荟萃分析。

DOI:
10.18632/oncotarget.14064
复制
发表时间:
2017-01-24
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Chen L
Chen L
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gao Y;Zhang K;Xi H;Cai A;Wu X;Cui J;Li J;Qiao Z;Wei B;Chen L

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)为胃癌(GC)的检测提供了一种微创方法。然而,其在胃癌的诊断和预后价值仍不清楚。共有16项研究,包括1193例胃癌患者符合我们的纳入标准。合并的灵敏度和特异性分别为0.62(95%置信区间(CI)0.59 - 0.65)和0.95(95% CI 0.93-0.96)。AUSROC(SROC下面积)曲线为0.94(95% CI 0.89-0.98)。结果显示,某些ctDNA标记物的存在与较大的肿瘤大小(OR:0.26,95%CI 0.11-0.61,p = 0.002)、TNM分期(I + II/III + IV,OR:0.11,95%CI 0.07 - 0.17,p = 0.000)以及H.幽门感染(H.p阴性/H.p阳性,OR:0.57,95% CI 0.36-0.91,p = 0.018)。此外,ctDNA的存在与总生存率(HR 1.77,95% CI 1.38 - 2.28,p < 0.001)以及无病生存率(HR 4.36,95% CI 3.08 - 6.16,p < 0.001)之间也存在显著相关性。检索Pubmed、Embase、科克伦图书馆和Web of Science数据库中截至2016年11月30日发表的相关文献。通过Meta-Disc软件合并诊断准确性变量。应用Engauge Digitizer和Stata软件进行预测数据提取和分析。我们的荟萃分析表明,某些ctDNA靶点的检测与GC患者的不良预后显著相关,具有高特异性和相对中等的敏感性。
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has offered a minimally invasive approach for detection and measurement of gastric cancer (GC). However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer still remains unclear. A total of 16 studies comprising 1193 GC patients met our inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59−0.65) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.96), respectively. The AUSROC (area under SROC) curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.98). The results showed that the presence of certain ctDNA markers was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.61, p = 0.002), TNM stage (I + II/III + IV, OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.07−0.17, p = 0.000), as well as H. pylori infection. (H.p negative/H.p positive, OR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.36–0.91, p = 0.018). Moreover, there was also a significant association between the presence of ctDNA and worse overall survival (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38−2.28, p < 0.001), as well as disease-free survival (HR 4.36, 95% CI 3.08−6.16, p < 0.001). Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for relating literature published up until November 30, 2016. Diagnostic accuracy variables were pooled by the Meta-Disc software. Engauge Digitizer and Stata software were applied for prognostic data extraction and analysis. Our meta-analysis indicates the detection of certain ctDNA targets is significantly associated with poor prognosis of GC patients, with high specificity and relatively moderate sensitivity.