Who we are and what we have: designing with minoritized communities
Who we are and what we have: designing with minoritized communities
复制标题
我们是谁以及我们拥有什么：与少数群体社区一起设计
DOI：
10.1145/3557984
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wiberg, Mikael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pei, Lucy;Wong-Villacres, Marisol;Erete, Sheena;Rosner, Daniela;Taylor, Alex;Wiberg, Mikael
纵观计算的历史，我们可以看到有多少最初的努力集中在工作场所计算工具和消费产品的设计上，其中以人为本的方法需要在资源丰富的环境中找到并满足用户的需求。但是谁被描绘成用户呢？谁有特权，谁又是隐形人？简而言之，我们为谁设计？最近，许多设计和人机交互的工作都集中在少数群体。我们使用少数服从理论家何塞·穆尼奥斯（José Muñoz），他使用术语“索引公民主体，由于阶级，种族和性别等社会内部的对抗，在多数主义公共领域内被贬低”。少数群体往往代表性不足，服务不足，资源不足;少数群体的概念强调权力关系超过人口统计或对资源分配的非历史化描述。对于参与少数群体社区的研究人员和实践者来说，解决设计师和社区之间的权力关系至关重要，同时要认识到，评估和利用社区中存在的资产，优势和能力，这些资产，优势和能力通常被其局限性所认可。一组研究人员和设计人员一直在借鉴各种传统，验证和集中社区的优势，提出一种基于资产的方法来设计技术。其中包括密西西比自由学校的反压迫教学法和奥兰多·法尔斯·博尔达关于参与行动的工作
Across the history of computing, we can see how many initial efforts focused on the design of workplace computing tools and consumer products, where a human-centered approach entailed finding and satisfying the needs of a user in a resource-rich setting. But who is pictured as the user? Who is privileged, and who is rendered invisible? In short, whom do we design for? Recently, much work in design and HCI has focused on minoritized communities. We use minoritized following theorist José Muñoz, who uses the term “to index citizensubjects who, due to antagonisms within the social such as class, race, and sex, are debased within the majoritarian public sphere”[1]. Minoritized communities are often also underrepresented, underserved, and underresourced; the concept of being minoritized emphasizes power relationships over demography or a dehistoricized description of resource distribution. It is crucial for researchers and practitioners engaged with minoritized communities to grapple with power relations between designers and communities, while recognizing, valorizing, and leveraging the assets, strengths, and capacities that are present in communities typically recognized by their limits. A group of researchers and designers have been drawing upon various traditions that validate and center community strengths to propose an assets-based approach to the design of technology. These include the antioppression pedagogy of the Mississippi Freedom Schools and Orlando Fals Borda’s work on participatory action