Tool trouble: Challenges with using self‐report data to evaluate long‐term chemistry teacher professional development
Tool trouble: Challenges with using self‐report data to evaluate long‐term chemistry teacher professional development
复制标题
工具麻烦:使用自我报告数据评估长期化学教师专业发展的挑战
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Senetta F. Bancroft
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Deborah G. Herrington;Ellen J. Yezierski;Senetta F. Bancroft
The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of different instruments, independently developed and traditionally used for measuring science teachers’ beliefs in short-term interventions, to longitudinally measure teachers’ changing beliefs. We compared the ability of three self-report instruments (Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument Form A [STEBI], Teaching of Science as Inquiry instrument [TSI], Inquiry Teaching Beliefs instrument [ITB]) and one observational instrument (Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol [RTOP]) to appropriately measure high school chemistry teachers’ beliefs as they engaged in a two and a half year professional development program. Collectively our findings from these four instruments, across three separate cohort of teachers (N = 16), indicated conflicting changes in teacher beliefs. For example, the STEBI indicated teachers’ self-efficacy remained unchanged or increased while the TSI indicated a concurrent decrease in self-efficacy throughout the PD program. Additionally, the ITB seemed to indicate a decrease in teachers’ knowledge of inquiry while their interview data and RTOP scores indicated a concurrent increase in their knowledge of and ability to enact inquiry-based practices. We reconcile these conflicting results and discuss the implications these findings have for validly and reliably measuring science teacher belief changes within longer duration PD. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53:1055–1081, 2016