Posthuman co-production: becoming response-able with what matters
Posthuman co-production: becoming response-able with what matters
复制标题
DOI：
10.1108/qrj-01-2021-0005
复制
发表时间：
2022-01-13
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Ivinson, Gabrielle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Renold, E. J.;Ivinson, Gabrielle
目的介绍后人类合拍片的概念。它探讨了过程和关系的本体认识论如何告知一种巧妙的、可响应的（Barad 2007）女权主义新唯物主义实践，这种实践将人类和重新中心化。后人类联合制作突出了制作“飞镖”（Renold, 2018）；创造性的研究人工制品，携带“重要的东西”，并实施可以跨越时间和多个“问题空间”的变化（Lury, 2020），作为一种缓慢的、共同生产的广泛的、后定性实践。该论文通过三个“假象”来讲述这一实践，提供了对威尔士关系和性教育（RSE）政策和实践领域中聚集的象形图的后定性旅程的一瞥。每首赋格曲都暗示了正在形成中的飞镖的政治、机智和生活潜力，以及它们在六年时间里的重要性。他们共同绘制了一个根茎状的旅程，将合作制作重新配置为一个负责任的、有意义的。作为一种超越人类的变革力量，在资助研究和参与的时间远远超过了时间的时候，“重要事物的呐喊”（Stengers 2019）继续向儿童和年轻人发出，为研究影响的可持续性和物质遗产赋予了新的意义。
Purpose This paper introduces the concept of posthuman co-production. It explores how processual and relational onto-epistemologies inform an artful, response-able (Barad 2007) feminist new materialist praxis that decentres the human and re-centres matter. Design/methodology/approach Posthuman co-production gives prominence to crafting "dartaphacts" (Renold, 2018); creative research artefacts, carrying "what matters" and enacting change that can be mapped across time and multiple "problem spaces" (Lury, 2020), as an expansive, post-qualitative praxis of slow, co-production. Findings The paper stories this praxis across three "fugal figurations" providing glimpses into the post-qualitative journeys of assembled dartaphacts in the policy and practice field of relationships and sexuality education (RSE) in Wales. Each fugue hints at the polytical, resourceful and living potential of dartaphacts in the making and their mattering over a period of six years. Collectively, they chart a rhizomatic journey that re-configures co-production as a response-able, becoming-with what matters. Originality/value As more-than-human forces for change, dartaphacts continue to surface "the cries of what matters" (Stengers 2019) for children and young people well beyond the periods of funded research and engagement, giving new meaning to the sustainability and material legacies of research impact.