Perception of the Argumentativeness Trait in Interpersonal Relationship Situations.
Perception of the Argumentativeness Trait in Interpersonal Relationship Situations.
复制标题
对人际关系情境中争论特质的看法。
DOI：
10.2224/sbp.1989.17.1.111
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
W. E. Hensley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. M. Waggenspack;W. E. Hensley
使用Infante和Rancer（1982）的争论性量表（Scale of Argumentativity）评估了人际关系中与争论性或非争论性个体的期望联系。七个潜在的社会互动领域的大学生（N = 420），以判断他们的可能性所需的互动与一个argentative或nonargentative person. Factor分析发现两个主要方面：社会情感，涉及严重依赖于社会互动，和谈判者/监察员，需要互动，其中一个可能会作为另一个代理。结果表明，这两个维度几乎占一半（48%）的方差的决策结构中使用的选择与争论或nonargumentative他人。在冲突和非攻击性较低的情况下，倾向于与非争论性的人交往。此外，男性和女性在报告他们的喜好与争论或nonargentative人在各种人际关系的情况下，以类似的方式作出反应。
The desired association with argumentative or nonargumentative individuals in inter-personal relationships was assessed using the Infante and Rancer (1982) Scale of Argumentativeness. Seven potential areas of social interaction were presented to college students ( N = 420) to judge their likelihood of desired interaction with an argumentative or nonargumentative person. Factor analysis revealed two primary dimensions: social-emotional , involving heavy reliance on social interaction, and negotiator/ombudsman , requiring interaction where one might serve as agent for another. Results indicated that these 2 dimensions account for almost half (48%) the variance of the decisional structure used in opting to associate with argumentative or nonargumentative others. There was a preference for association with a nonargumentative person in situations, which are low in conflict and nonaggressive. Also, males and females respond in a similar fashion in reporting their preferences to associate with argumentative or nonargumentative persons in various interpersonal situations.