Feasibility and Utility of Different Approaches to Violence Risk Assessment for Young Adults Receiving Treatment for Early Psychosis.
Feasibility and Utility of Different Approaches to Violence Risk Assessment for Young Adults Receiving Treatment for Early Psychosis.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10597-021-00922-6
复制
发表时间：
2022-08
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Appelbaum PS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rolin SA;Scodes J;Dambreville R;Nossel IR;Bello I;Wall MM;Scott Stroup T;Dixon LB;Appelbaum PS
这项试验性研究对接受早期精神病治疗的年轻人进行了暴力风险评估。在这项研究中，30名参与者在基线时接受了暴力风险评估。参与者在3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月时完成了随访评估，以确定暴力行为的发生率。个体平均年龄为24.1岁（SD = 3.3岁），主要为男性（n = 24，80%）。在这一样本中，有6人（20%）报告在研究期间从事暴力行为。参与暴力行为的个体具有更高水平的消极紧迫感（t（28）= 2.21，p = 0.035）本研究旨在建立暴力风险评估在早期精神病治疗中的可行性，可接受性和临床实用性。总的来说，这项研究发现，大多数患有早期精神病的人（正在接受治疗）没有暴力的风险。研究结果表明，患有早期精神病的年轻人的暴力行为与消极紧迫感增加有关。在线版本包含补充材料，可通过10.1007/s10597-021-00922-6获得。
This pilot study examined violence risk assessment among a sample of young adults receiving treatment for early psychosis. In this study, thirty participants were assessed for violence risk at baseline. Participants completed follow-up assessments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months to ascertain prevalence of violent behavior. Individuals were on average 24.1 years old (SD = 3.3 years) and predominantly male (n = 24, 80%). In this sample, six people (20%) reported engaging in violence during the study period. Individuals who engaged in violence had higher levels of negative urgency (t(28) = 2.21, p = 0.035) This study sought to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of violence risk assessment for clients in treatment for early psychosis. Overall, this study found that most individuals with early psychosis in this study (who are in treatment) were not at risk of violence. Findings suggest that violent behavior among young adults with early psychosis is associated with increased negative urgency. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10597-021-00922-6.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.e4692
发表时间：
2012-07-24
期刊：
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fazel S;Singh JP;Doll H;Grann M
通讯作者：
Grann M
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Chang, Wing Chung;Chan, Sherina Suet In;Chen, Eric Yu Hai
通讯作者：
Chen, Eric Yu Hai
影响因子：
2
作者：
Hutton, Paul;Parker, Sophie;Ford, Sarah
通讯作者：
Ford, Sarah
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Cyders, Melissa A.;Smith, Gregory T.
通讯作者：
Smith, Gregory T.
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Cyders, Melissa A.;Littlefield, Andrew K.;Coffey, Scott;Karyadi, Kenny A.
通讯作者：
Karyadi, Kenny A.