THE PARTY FAMILY AND ITS STUDY
THE PARTY FAMILY AND ITS STUDY
复制标题
党家及其学习
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cas Mudde
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Mair;Cas Mudde
虽然政党家族的概念，以及它所暗示的各种跨国家和跨时间的相似性，是比较政党政治的大部分标准工作的基础，但它仍然是理论化最少和最不具体的政党一般分类方法之一。四个主要的方法，用于确定政党家庭进行了讨论：起源和社会学，跨国联系，政策和意识形态，党的名称。每种方法的优点和缺点进行了评估，因为是一些更普遍的问题，可能与所有四种方法。最适合于政党家族的规范和分类的两种方法是基于政党起源及其意识形态的方法，但这两种方法应该并行发展，而不是作为替代。两者都利用政党是什么，而不是政党做什么，因此更有可能揭示核心身份和共同的政治目标。
Although the notion of the party family, with the various cross-national and cross-temporal similarities it implies, underlies much of the standard work on comparative party politics, it nevertheless remains one of the most undertheorized and least specified approaches to the general classification of parties. Four of the principal approaches that are used to identify party families are discussed: origins and sociology, transnational links, policy and ideology, and party name. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are assessed, as are some of the more generic problems that may be associated with all four approaches. The two approaches that appear best suited to the specification and classification of party families are those based on the origin of parties and their ideology, but these should be developed in parallel rather than as alternatives. Both tap into what parties are rather than what parties do and hence are more likely to uncover core identities and shared political goals.