ARTICLE 59 - REINTERPRETATION OR REVISION

ARTICLE 59 - REINTERPRETATION OR REVISION
复制标题

DOI:
10.2307/1222498
复制
发表时间:
1992-02-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
TAYLOR, JW
TAYLOR, JW
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
REYNOLDS, DR;TAYLOR, JW

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

多形性真菌的命名优先权由法典第59条规定。第59章可以有不止一种解释根据目前使用的广义解释,假定所有真菌都具有多态性的潜力,该条款适用于所有真菌。在发现有性状态之前,没有证明有性状态的真菌被分类为半知菌亚门(Deuteromycotina),但是,如果有另一种严格的解释,第59条将仅适用于已被证明为多形性的真菌物种。在后一种解释下,有性、无性和多形性真菌将被分类在一起,而形式分类群将是不必要的。
Nomenclatural priority in pleomorphic fungi is regulated by Article 59 of the Code. We show that Article 59 can be interpreted in more than one way. By the broad interpretation in current use, the potential for pleomorphy is assumed of all fungi and the Article is applied to all fungi. Fungi without a demonstrated sexual state are classified in the form taxon, Deuteromycotina, until a sexual state is found. With an alternative and strict interpretation, however, Article 59 would apply only to fungal species that have been actually demonstrated to be pleomorphic. Under the latter interpretation, sexual, asexual, and pleomorphic fungi would be classified together and form taxa would not be necessary.