TESTING HUMAN ERRORS IN VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING
TESTING HUMAN ERRORS IN VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING
复制标题
测试虚拟现实训练中的人为错误
作者：
Luboš Kotek;Zdeněk Tůma;K. Šubrt;Jiří Kroupa;P. Blecha;Jana Rozehnalová;R. Blecha;P. Heinrich
工业过程工厂操作员的应急培训是提高人为因素处理紧急情况的可靠性的最广泛使用的工具之一。然而，准备和操作成熟的模拟器和训练器是非常昂贵的，因此，使用虚拟环境工具。一个尚未得到回答的问题是：虚拟现实是否能与其他操作方法的可靠性相匹配，以及虚拟现实中的相同培训是否有效？实验是在三个墙壁的虚拟洞穴中进行的，带有虚拟现实眼镜，有一台电脑，一个平板电脑和一个真实的控制面板。视觉刺激显示在虚拟监视器的屏幕上（绿色、黄色和红色）;听觉刺激是频率为250、1000和4000 Hz的纯音。结论应明确说明为研究定义的假设是否已得到证实，并且在接口类型方面存在显著差异。虚拟现实中的训练会降低操作员的可靠性，但在特定条件下（视觉刺激，虚拟现实眼镜）可以匹配其他操作方法的可靠性，并且可以有效。
The emergency training of industrial process plant operators is one of the most widely used tools to increase the reliability of human factors to handle an emergency situation. However, the preparation and operation of full-fledged simulators and trainers is very expensive and, therefore, virtual environment tools are used. A question that has not yet been answered is: Can virtual reality match the reliability of other methods of operation and is the same training in virtual reality effective? The experiment was carried out in the three-walled virtual CAVE, with virtual reality glasses, with a computer, a tablet, and a real control panel. Visual stimuli were displayed on the screen of the virtual monitor (green, yellow, and red); auditory stimuli were pure tones with frequencies of 250, 1000 and 4000 Hz. The conclusion should explicitly state if the hypothesis defined for the research has been confirmed and there are significant differences in terms of interface type. Training in virtual reality induces lower operator reliability, but in specific conditions (visual stimuli, virtual reality glasses) can match the reliability of other methods of operation and can be effective.