Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling.
Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling.
复制标题
因果关系、确认、可信度和结构方程建模。
DOI：
10.2307/1130287
复制
发表时间：
1987
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
M. Marlin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Biddle;M. Marlin
比德尔，布鲁斯J.和马林，马乔里M.因果关系，确认，轻信，和结构方程模型。儿童发展，1987,58,4-17。最近，行为科学期刊上出现了越来越多地使用结构方程建模技术。这些技术包括因果建模、路径图、普通最小二乘回归分析和强大的模型分析方法，如LISREL。这些技术提供了显著的优点，然而它们似乎被许多人误解和滥用。讨论了与这些技术相关的优点和问题。指出了可用于判断结构方程建模成功与否的准则。合理的进步和轻信被检查为热情的结构方程建模技术的原因。
BIDDLE, BRUCE J., and MARLIN, MARJORIE M. Causality, Confirmation, Credulity, and Structural Equation Modeling. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1987, 58, 4-17. Increased use for the techniques of structural equation modeling have recently appeared in behavioral science journals. These techniques include causal modeling, path diagrams, ordinary least-squares regression analysis, and powerful methods for model analysis such as LISREL. These techniques offer significant advantages, and yet they appear to be misunderstood and misused by many persons. Advantages and problems associated with these techniques are discussed. Criteria are noted that may be used for judging the success of structural equation modeling. Legitimate advances and credulity are examined as reasons for enthusiasm for the techniques of structural equation modeling.