Development Alternatives: Practice, Dilemmas and Theory

Development Alternatives: Practice, Dilemmas and Theory
复制标题

发展选择:实践、困境和理论

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Bebbington
D. Bebbington
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Bebbington;D. Bebbington

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文认为,许多关于公民社会和替代发展的学术著作存在三个弱点:它低估了大众组织之间的多样性及其关于发展替代方案的想法;对替代方案的经济层面关注不够;它低估了当地政府的潜在重要性。借鉴玻利维亚高地的经验,我们建议,更密切地了解在寻求发展替代方案的实际尝试中遇到的困境,可以为每个领域的前进提出建议。因此,出于理论原因和相关性,将学术和实践工作联系起来非常重要。
This paper argues that much scholarly work on civil society and alternative development has three weaknesses: it understates the diversity among popular organizations and their ideas about development alternatives; it pays insufficient attention to the economic dimensions of alternatives; and it understates the potential importance of the local state. Drawing on experiences from highland Bolivia, we suggest that a closer engagement with the dilemmas encountered in practical attempts to pursue development alternatives can suggest ways forward in each of these areas. Linking scholarly and practical work is thus important for theoretical reasons as well as ones of relevance.