Driving simulator validation with hazard perception
Driving simulator validation with hazard perception
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.008
复制
发表时间：
2011-11-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Chapman, Peter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Underwood, Geoffrey;Crundall, David;Chapman, Peter
我们应该如何评估在道路上驾驶和在模拟器中“驾驶”的可比性？如果观察到相似的行为模式，个体之间存在相似的差异，那么我们可以得出结论，在模拟器中驾驶将提供具有代表性的结果，并且可以欣赏模拟器的优势（受控环境，危险情况）。为了评估驾驶模拟器，我们比较了在道路上驾驶时的危险检测，在观看车辆行驶时记录的短片片段时，以及在驾驶员控制速度/方向的90度前视（加后视镜）的全仪器固定底座模拟器中驾驶通过模拟城市时。在这三种情况下，我们发现经验更丰富的司机（尤其是专业司机）会增加扫描，经验丰富的司机会更早地盯着危险物体。这种可比性鼓励在驾驶员培训和测试中使用模拟器。(C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd.版权所有。
How should we assess the comparability of driving on a road and "driving" in a simulator? If similar patterns of behaviour are observed, with similar differences between individuals, then we can conclude that driving in the simulator will deliver representative results and the advantages of simulators (controlled environments, hazardous situations) can be appreciated. To evaluate a driving simulator here we compare hazard detection while driving on roads, while watching short film clips recorded from a vehicle moving through traffic, and while driving through a simulated city in a fully instrumented fixed-base simulator with a 90 degree forward view (plus mirrors) that is under the speed/direction control of the driver. In all three situations we find increased scanning by more experienced and especially professional drivers, and earlier eye fixations on hazardous objects for experienced drivers. This comparability encourages the use of simulators in drivers training and testing. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.