Progressive Changes in Liquefaction and Cone Penetration Resistance across Multiple Shaking Events in Centrifuge Tests
Progressive Changes in Liquefaction and Cone Penetration Resistance across Multiple Shaking Events in Centrifuge Tests
复制标题
离心测试中多次振动事件中液化和锥体穿透阻力的逐渐变化
DOI:
10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001995
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Bronner, Jaclyn D.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Darby, Kathleen M.;Boulanger, Ross W.;DeJong, Jason T.;Bronner, Jaclyn D.
The effects of shaking history on cone penetration test (CPT)–based liquefaction triggering correlations for clean saturated sand are examined by using cone penetration resistance and cyclic strength data pairs from dynamic centrifuge model tests. Three model tests on a 9-m-radius centrifuge examined the liquefaction responses of level profiles of saturated Ottawa F-65 sand subjected to multiple (17–29) shaking events that produced successive changes in density and model response characteristics. Inverse analysis of data from dense accelerometer arrays were used to define time series of cyclic stress ratios and shear strains throughout the profile. Cyclic resistance ratios against triggering ofexcess pore pressure ratio in 15 equivalent uniform cycles were computed at multiple depths based on weighting of the cyclic stress ratio time series up to the time of triggering. Cone penetration tests performed at select times during each model test were used to define the variation in cone tip resistances with depth and shaking history. The resulting data pairs, with normalized cone tip resistances ranging from 20 to 340 and cyclic resistance ratios ranging from 0.1 to 2.0, show that both quantities progressively increase as a result of recurrent liquefaction events and generally follow the trends predicted by case history–based liquefaction triggering correlations. Three 1-m-radius centrifuge tests of similar configurations produced consistent results. Implications for the interpretation of case histories and engineering practice are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Chaney;K. Demars;DP Stewart;Y;BL Kutter
通讯作者:
BL Kutter
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017-06
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. M. P. Bastidas;R. Boulanger;T. Carey;J. DeJong
通讯作者:
A. M. P. Bastidas;R. Boulanger;T. Carey;J. DeJong
DOI:
10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000632
发表时间:
2012-06
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
T. Kokusho;Fumiki Ito;Y. Nagao;A. Green
通讯作者:
T. Kokusho;Fumiki Ito;Y. Nagao;A. Green
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V
影响因子:
--
作者:
F. Giuffrida;M. Fleith;Amélie Goyer;T. Samuel;Isabelle Elmelegy;Patric Fontannaz;C. Cruz;Sagar K. Thakkar;Cathriona R Monnard;C. A. De Castro;L. Lavalle;T. Rakza;M. Agosti;Isam Al;Almerinda Barroso Pereira;M. Costeira;G. Marchini;M. Vanpee;T. Stiris;S. Stoicescu;Maria Gorett Silva;J. Picaud;C. Martínez;M. Domellöf;C. Billeaud
通讯作者:
C. Billeaud
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
W. El;T. Abdoun;R. Dobry
通讯作者:
R. Dobry