Theories of Attention

Theories of Attention
复制标题

注意力理论

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-68390-9_2
复制
发表时间:
1982
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
M. Eysenck
M. Eysenck
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Eysenck

文献摘要

相似文献

注意的概念在心理学史上经历了一个相当曲折的过程。世纪的内省主义者和纸上谈兵的理论家对注意力给予了高度评价,他们中的一些人对注意力有重要的见解。例如,威廉·詹姆斯(William James,1980)的以下引文预见了后来的一些理论发展:“那么,如果最初的问题,我们能同时注意多少观念或事物,意味着有多少完全不相连的系统或概念过程能同时进行,答案是,不容易超过一个,除非这些过程是非常习惯的;但后来是两个,甚至三个,没有太多的心灵振荡从一个到另一个,也没有随之而来的时间增益”(第409页)。
The concept of attention has led a rather chequered existence during the history of psychology. It was highly regarded by the introspectionists and armchair theorizers of the nineteenth century, some of whom had important things to say about attention. For example, the following quotation from William James (1980) anticipates a number of later theoretical developments: “If, then, by the original question, how many ideas or things can we attend to at once, be meant how many entirely disconnected systems or processes of conception can go on simultaneously, the answer is, not easily more than one, unless the processes are very habitual; but then two, or even three, without very much oscillation of the mind from one to the next, and no consequent gain of time” (p. 409).