Public‐Private Collaboration
Public‐Private Collaboration
复制标题
公私合作
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0024
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Zeckhauser
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Donahue;R. Zeckhauser
经济学家最常通过努力确定政府的适当目标（福利经济学领域）并指导相互竞争的主张之间的资源分配（成本效益分析领域）来为公共政策分析做出贡献。然而，补充且同样重要的分析任务是为手段的选择和管理提供信息。例如，一旦将贸易流离失所工人的再培训确定为需要大量支出的目标，分析师的工作就远未结束。政府是否应该自行开展培训计划、与社区组织签订合同、向失业工人发放代金券，或者利用税收优惠来吸引企业提供培训？哪些原则告诉我们政府直接供应、委托给私人非营利组织或营利性供应是否是公园管理、对外援助或肾透析的最佳方法？
Economists most frequently contribute to public policy analysis through efforts to identify government’s proper goals (the domain of welfare economics) and to guide the allocation of resources across competing claims (the domain of cost-effectiveness analysis.) Yet a complementary and equally important analytic task is to inform the choice and management of means. Once retraining for trade-displaced workers is identified as a goal that warrants major spending, for example, the analyst’s job is by no means done. Should government run training programs itself, contract with a community organization, issue vouchers to displaced workers, or use a tax incentive to induce firms to provide training? What principles tell us whether direct government supply, delegation to private nonprofits, or for-profit provision is the best approach to park management, foreign aid, or renal dialysis?