Liver Function in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Randomized to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Liver Function in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Randomized to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/sla.0000000000002397
复制
发表时间:
2017-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
Krawczyk, Marek
Krawczyk, Marek
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kalinowski, Piotr;Paluszkiewicz, Rafal;Krawczyk, Marek

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:该研究的目的是在一项随机临床试验(NCT01806506)中比较袖式胃切除术(SG)与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)对非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)肥胖患者肝功能的影响。背景:NAFLD或脂肪性肝炎(NASH)患者在减肥手术后体重迅速减轻和吸收不良可能损害肝功能。方法:66例随机分配到SG或RYGB的病态肥胖患者纳入次要结局分析。术中肝活检采用NAFLD活动评分(NAS)进行分类,术前、术后1个月、6个月和12个月分别进行肝功能检查。结果:54.5%的RYGB患者和51.5%的SG患者存在NASH (P < 0.05)。12个月时,SG组体重减轻68.7 +/- 19.7%,RYGB组体重减轻62.8 +/- 18.5% (P < 0.05)。RYGB治疗后1个月国际标准化比值(INR)升高(0.98 +/- 0.05 vs 1.14 +/- 0.11, P < 0.05), SG治疗后1个月国际标准化比值(INR)升高(0.99 +/- 0.06 vs 1.04 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05), RYGB治疗组及NASH患者INR升高明显高于SG治疗组。RYGB白蛋白在1个月后下降(41.2 +/- 2.7 vs 39.0 +/- 3.2 g/L; P < 0.05)。12个月时,INR和白蛋白恢复到基线水平。在NASH组12个月时,SG诱导天冬氨酸转氨酶(32.4 +/- 17.4 vs 21.5 +/- 6.9U/L)、丙氨酸转氨酶(39.9 +/- 28.6U/L vs 23.8 +/- 14.1U/L)、γ -谷氨酰转肽酶(34.3 +/- 16.6 vs 24.5 +/- 16.8U/L)和乳酸脱氢酶(510.8 +/- 33 vs 292.4 +/- 29)显著改善。预测1个月后INR变化的变量包括手术类型、NAS >= 5、胆红素、体重指数、糖化血红蛋白和血脂异常。结论:接受RYGB治疗的NASH患者比接受SG治疗的患者更容易发生早期一过性肝功能恶化。
Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the influence of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on liver function in bariatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in a randomized clinical trial (NCT01806506).Background: Rapid weight loss and malabsorption after bariatric surgery in patients with NAFLD or steatohepatitis (NASH) may impair liver function.Methods: Sixty-six morbidly obese patients randomized to SG or RYGB were included in a secondary outcome analysis. Intraoperative liver biopsies were categorized with NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) and liver function tests were done before surgery and after 1, 6 and 12 months.Results: NASH was present in 54.5% RYGB and 51.5% SG patients (P > 0.05). At 12 months excess weight loss was 68.7 +/- 19.7% after SG and 62.8 +/- 18.5% after RYGB (P > 0.05). At 1 month international normalized ratio (INR) increased after RYGB (0.98 +/- 0.05 vs 1.14 +/- 0.11; P < 0.05) and SG (0.99 +/- 0.06 vs 1.04 +/- 0.06; P < 0.05), RYGB induced significantly greater increase in INR in the whole group and NASH patients than SG. After RYGB albumin decreased at 1 month (41.2 +/- 2.7 vs 39.0 +/- 3.2 g/L; P < 0.05). At 12 months, INR and albumin returned to baseline. At 12 months in NASH group, SG induced significant improvement in aspartate aminotransferase (32.4 +/- 17.4 vs 21.5 +/- 6.9U/L), alanine aminotransferase (39.9 +/- 28.6U/L vs 23.8 +/- 14.1U/L), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (34.3 +/- 16.6 vs 24.5 +/- 16.8U/L), and lactate dehydrogenase (510.8 +/- 33 vs 292.4 +/- 29). Variables predictive of INR change after 1 month included operation type, NAS >= 5, bilirubin, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, and dyslipidemia.Conclusions: Patients with NASH undergoing RYGB are more susceptible to early transient deterioration of liver function than after SG.